From Mexico: Supabase shipped Explorer and Notebooks, one editor for database and log queries plus saved, rerunnable investigations that live in your repo. Its Assistant can write the cells, but only with your approval.
From Mexico: Hud launched agentic rollouts, which check an agent’s PR against how the code really runs in production, watch the canary at the function level and roll back fast. Here’s how it works and what I’d verify first.
From Mexico: Adversa AI launched a security platform that watches what coding agents like Claude Code and Codex actually do on developer machines and blocks the risky step in a chain. Here’s what it covers and what I’d check.
From Mexico: GitHub Agentic Workflows is now generally available. You describe a repo chore in Markdown, it compiles to Actions YAML, and a coding agent runs it read-only in a sandbox. Here’s what shipped and what I’d check.
From Mexico: Bito launched Governor, a router that sits between your coding agents and your models, picks a model per request and answers codebase searches itself. Bito claims big savings. Here’s how it works and what I’d check.
From Mexico: Entire, the startup led by former GitHub CEO Thomas Dohmke, launched a Git forge built for coding agents. Trails replace the pull request with evals that agents score on every push. What’s in it and what I’d check.
From Mexico: Microsoft Research released the code for Agensh, a harness where coding agents claim their own sub-tasks with no manager agent. On Pandoc, 1,024 agents hit 55% of tests in six hours. What I’d check before trying it.
From Mexico: a new study ran the same models through Claude Code, OpenCode and mini-SWE-agent. Pass rates barely moved, but cost per task changed by up to 3x. What the harness actually buys, and what I’d measure first.
From Mexico: doubleAI launched Maxwell, an AI that sits inside a running program, rewrites the machine code underneath and claims a formal proof for every change. Your source stays untouched. Here’s what I think it means for teams.
From Mexico: Anthropic published a report on how coding agents changed its own engineering teams. More code per engineer, no drop in its quality checks, fewer junior roles and more meetings. Here’s what stood out to me.